Obama contradicts Thoreau

On the one hand there is the recent presidential speech in Virginia, that brought on some sizzling hot comments. Here is the criticised passage, copied from the White House website.

There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me — because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t — look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. (Applause.)

If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.  Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.

On the other hand there is Henry David Thoreau’s vigorous critique on slavery, in defense of civil rights, including the majority of one. Excerpt from the first page, On the duty of civil disobedience, 1849.

This American government — what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity? It has not the vitality and force of a single living man; for a single man can bend it to his will. It is a sort of wooden gun to the people themselves. But it is not the less necessary for this; for the people must have some complicated machinery or other, and hear its din, to satisfy that idea of government which they have. Governments show thus how successfully men can be imposed upon, even impose on themselves, for their own advantage. It is excellent, we must all allow. Yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way. It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way. For government is an expedient, by which men would fain succeed in letting one another alone; and, as has been said, when it is most expedient, the governed are most let alone by it. Trade and commerce, if they were not made of india-rubber, would never manage to bounce over obstacles which legislators are continually putting in their way; and if one were to judge these men wholly by the effects of their actions and not partly by their intentions, they would deserve to be classed and punished with those mischievious persons who put obstructions on the railroads.

Is Barack Obama saying that resistance is futile? Big government comes in peace and you should all refrain from personal endeavours  and individual thinking. Disobedience, civil or otherwise will be dealt with harshly.

In conclusion: Barack Obama is going to lose the election because he neglects to see the freeing of the slaves as an individual right, or because he does not see any individual rights at all? Or he’s going to win, because nobody reads the newspapers anyway?



Det här inlägget postades i Äganderätt, Frihet och har märkts med etiketterna , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bokmärk permalänken.

2 svar på Obama contradicts Thoreau

  1. Samuel af Ugglas skriver:

    Du törs komma med synpunkter där få andra ingen ryggrad har, tack för det!

  2. allemand skriver:

    Your last sentence is probably the truth and nothing but the truth.

Kommentarer är stängda.