Higgins Memo

En anställd på National Security Council, NSC, Rich Higgins skrev ett mycket välformulerat memo om hur Trump bör agera för att åstadkomma nödvändiga förändringar och undvika att få sluta i förtid. För det fick Higgins sparken. Hela det sjusidiga memot finns inlagt i en artikel i Foreign Policy. Här nedan återger jag de två första sidorna och slutsatsen. Mycket av hans kritik mot media, kulturelit, akademi och republikanerna, skulle lika gärna kunna gälla samma grupper i Sverige, med Alliansen i republikanernas plats.


May 2017

BACKGROUND. The Trump administration is suffering under withering information campaigns designed to first undermine, then delegitimize and ultimately remove the President. Possibly confusing these attacks with an elevated interplay of otherwise normal D.C. partisan infighting and adversarial media relations, the White House response to these campaigns reflects a political advocacy mindset that it is intensely reactive, severely under-inclusive and dangerously inadequate to the threat. If action is not taken to re-scope and respond to these hostile campaigns very soon, the administration risks implosion and subsequent early departure from the White House.

This is not politics as usual but rather political warfare at an unprecedented level that is openly engaged in the direct targeting of a seated president through manipulation of the news cycle. It must be recognized on its own terms so that immediate action can be taken. At its core, these campaigns run on multiple lines of effort, serve as the non-violent line of effort of a wider movement, and execute political warfare agendas that reflect cuiturai Marxist outcomes. The campaigns operate through narratives. Because the hard left is aligned with Islamist organizations at local (ANTIFA working with Muslim Brotherhood doing business as MSA and CAIR), national (ACLU and BLM working with CAIR and MPAC)

and international levels (OIC working with OSCE and the UN), recognition must given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate at the narrative level as weil. In candidate Trump, the opposition saw a threat to the ”politically correct” enforcement narratives they’ve meticulously laid in over the past few decades. In President Trump, they see a latent threat to eontinue that effort to ruinous effeet and their retaliatory response refleets this fear.

INTRODUCTION. Responding to relentless personal assaults on his character, candidate Trump identified the players and the strategy:

  • ”The establishment and their media enabiers will controi over this nation through means that are very weil known. Anyone who challenges their controi is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe, and morally deformed.” – President Trump, act 2016

Culturally conditioned to limit responses to such attacks as vet another round in the on-going drone from diversity and multicuiturai malcontents, these broadsides are discounted as political correctness run amuck. However, political correctness is a weapon against reason and critical thinking. This weapon functions as the enforcement mechanism of diversity narratives that seek to implement cultural Marxism. Candidate Trump’s rhetoric in the campaign not only cut through the Marxist narrative, he did so in ways that were viscerally comprehensible to a voting bloc that then made candidate Trump the president; making that bloc self-aware in the process. President Trump is either the candidate he ran as, or he is nothing. Recognizing in candidate Trump an existential threat to cuiturai Marxist memes that dominate the prevailing cultural narrative, those that benefit recognize the threat he poses and seek his destruction. For this cabal, Trump must be destroyed. Far from politics as usual, this is a political warfare effort that seeks the destruction of a sitting president. Since Trump took office, the situation has intensified to crisis level proportions. For those engaged in the effort, especially those from within the ”deep state” or permanent government apparatus, this raises clear Title 18 (legal) concerns.


The Opposition. While opposition to President Trump manifests itself through political warfare memes centered on cultural Marxist narratives, this hardly means that opposition is limited to Marxists as conventionally understood. Having become the dominant cultural meme, some benefit from it while others are captured by it; including ”deep state” actors, globalists, bankers, lslamists, and establishment Republicans. Through the campaign, candidate Trump tapped into a deep vein of concern among many citizens that America is at risk and is slipping away. Globalists and lslamists recognize that for their visions to succeed, America, both as an ideal and as a national and political identity, must be destroyed. Atomization of society must also occur at the individual level; with attacks directed against all levels of group and personal identity. Hence the sexism, racism and xenophobia memes. As a Judeo-Christian culture, forced inclusion of post-modern notions of tolerance is designed to induce nihilistic contradictions that reduce all thought, all faith, all loyalties to meaninglessness. Group rights based on sex or ethnicity are a direct assault on the very idea of individual human rights and natural law around which the Constitution was framed. ”Transgender acceptance” memes attack at the most basic level by denying a person the right to declare the biological fact of one’s sex. When a population has 2 + 2 = 5 imposed on it, there are many that benefit:

  • Mainstream Media -The principle mechanism for implementing narratives.
  • The Academy- Academia has served as a principle counter-state node for some time and remains a key conduit for creating future adherents to cultural Marxist narratives and their derivative worldview.
  • The Deep State – The successful outcome of cultural Marxism is a bureaucratic state beholden to no one, certainly not the American people . With no rule of law considerations outside those that further deep state power, the deep state truly becomes, as Hegel advocated, god bestriding the earth.
  • Global Corporatists & Bankers – Exploitation of populations, unfettered by national protections and notions of personal morality and piety.
  • Democratic Leadership – The democratic leadership has been a counter-state enabler that executes, sustains, and protects cultural Marxist programs of action and facilitates the relentless expansion of the deep state.
  • Republican Leadership – More afraid of being accused of being called a racist, sexist, homophobe or lslamophobe than of failing to enforce their oaths to ”support and defend the Constitution,” the Republican Establishment accepts and enforces cultural Marxist memes within its own sphere of operations. In doing so, knowingly or not, it becomes an agent of that. These ”conservatives” become increasingly indistinguishable from their democratic counterparts save that they misrepresent themselves to their constituents . Lacking the discernment to recognize their situation, they will work with globalists, corporatists, and the international financial interests and will likewise service the deep state. These establishment Republicans are the hard left’s designated defeat mechanism in the destruction of the old regime as well as the American ideal.1 Because candidate Trump publicly exposed them for their duplicitous activities, they are at risk as long as Trump can turn on them and are, therefore, bitter foes. Candidate Trump’s success remains an ongoing existential threat to establishment Republicans.

1For more information on how influence operations of the former Soviet Union targeted leading conservative groups and individuals in order to bring them into line with cultural Marxist narratives. See Link here.

  • lslamists – Isla mists ally with cultural Marxist because, as far back as the 1980s, they properly assessed that the hard left has a strong chance of reducing Western civilization to its benefit. Having co-opted post-modern narratives as critical points, Isla mists deploy these narrative to strategically blind and then control US decision makers. This is by design and purposeful. ”By their own hands!” has been the declared strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood since 1991. This strategy seeks to divide American society against itself with the forced imposition of Isla mist objectives on one half of American society by the other half. Once a society has been effectively atomized, the population will have lost its faith in the old order, detest those who reduced it, and divide along the lines of narrative adherence. This is the intended outcome of hostile information cum political warfare campaigns and today we see their effects on American society.

Complicating the current situation, many close to the president have pushed him off his message when he was candidate Trump thus alienating him from his base thereby isolating him in the process. When President Trump is not candidate Trump, he becomes dangerously exposed. While the base that elected candidate Trump identified with his vision, they are only Trump’s insofar as he holds to the vision that made him president.


The recent turn of events give rise to the observation that the defense of President Trump is the defense of America. In the same way President Lincoln was surrounded by political opposition both inside and outside of his wire, in bot h overt and covert forms, so too is President Trump. Had Lincoln failed, so too would have the Republic. The administration has been maneuvered into a constant backpedal by relentless political warfare attacks structured to force him to assume a reactive posture that assures inadequate responses. The president can either drive or be driven by events; it’s time for him to drive them.

Det här inlägget postades i Aktuella övriga ämnen och har märkts med etiketterna , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bokmärk permalänken.

4 svar på Higgins Memo

  1. Samuel af Ugglas skriver:

    Laglösheten tog verklig fart med Bill Ayers Acorn och Obama och det fattade aldrig Republikanerna.
    Det finns hyllmeter med fruktansvärda illdåd beskrivna som banat vägen för det vi upplever nu i Amerika. Googla på ”The Weathermen”.

  2. akesundstrom skriver:

    Vilken träffande och välformulerad utskåpning av USA:s republikanska etablissemang och generellt av The Deep State (Palmes starka stat). Men indirekt är Higgins text också, som Mats själv antyder, en lika mördande kritik av Sveriges förment borgerliga partier. Också dessa är den kulturella marxismens och den islamistiska terrorismens medlöpare, inte dess motpoler eller bekrigare som de själva påstår – lika falska och världsfrånvända som Trumps belackare.

    Med sådana vänner behöver den sanna liberalismen eller konservatismen inga fiender!.

    Det positiva i denna mörka bild är förstås att Trump likväl kunde vinna kampen om presidentposten. Väljarnas inre övertygelser, deras tro på den amerikanska drömmen och den unika författningen, övertrumfade propagandamegafonerna. Och i Sverige har moderaternas väljare röstat med fötterna, i drivor övergett sitt gamla parti och gjort SD till en vinnare. I den meningen kan folkets röst fortfarande höras trots de gamla partiapparaternas, medias och forskarsamhällets skamliga svek.

  3. Samuel af Ugglas skriver:

    Det här kanske är en lagom fortsättning på min kommentar tidigare: Obama Holdovers Still In Key National Security Council Jobs.

  4. Samuel af Ugglas skriver:

    Vi förväntar oss att Jenny Nordberg på SVENSKA DAGBLADET redovisar innehållet i länken för sina nyhetssuktande läsare,
    Leftist violence goes mainstream in America:http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/leftist-violence-goes-mainstream-in-america/

Kommentarer är stängda.